The
Press Conference room, S-226 is overcrowded with journalists and their
media equipment , diplomats and staffers of Chief
Executive Musharraf’s entourage. This is the relatively small
room below the Media floor that houses the United Nations
Correspondents’ Association offices. Today, the area
down the steps from S-226 is cordoned off because President
Clinton is addressing the Security Council. I watch his speech, Tony Blair’s speech and Shaikh
Hasina’s speech on TV monitors mounted on the walls in the UN press
office, while waiting for the Musharraf event to begin.
The Chief Executive,
accompanied to the table by aides, begins with a prepared statement
which touches on two points. He
speaks about the need for the UN to develop more effective dispute
resolutions measures. Second, he speaks about
the need to ease the burden of
debt on poor countries, which he claims is 50% of Pakistan’s
budget, so that the money saved
can be used in “social uplift.” Dispute resolution and debt relief
are popular themes of speeches in the
General Assembly this year.
Next, the Chief
Executive focuses on Kashmir. In
this, his first Millennium Summit, he has spoken about Kashmir in his General
Assembly address. He states
that people are talking about Kashmir because Pakistan is talking about
it. He dismisses India’s
position that Pakistan is not a party to the dispute as
“ridiculous.”
Musharraf then turns
to domestic issues. He
speaks about bringing the
“essence of democracy to the people of Pakistan.” He decries the
“poor governance” that presumably prevailed during the Sharif
regime, before his forcible takeover of the elected government of
Pakistan.
The floor is opened
to questions. A United Nations protocol officer selects journalists from
the floor to pose these, asking us to identify us by our names and press organizations. Today I am here in my capacity as United Nations
correspondent for World
Parliamentarian Magazine which is published from Brussels.
An Indian woman TV reporter asks about the “oppression of
minorities” in Pakistan which clearly irks the Chief Executive and
some ofd his aides. He retorts “Perhaps this question should be posed
on the other side of the border where they are killing Christians and
Sikhs.” The reporter Gita
Bajaj, from “Eye on Asia” also asks what would happen if not he,
Musharraf “a good
despot” but a “maniac” seized power.
She added “I’m
happy you are in charge.” To laughter from the floor.
Musharraf said “I am in charge.
I am definitely in charge. Nobody
has to worry. When I am
here, , nothing is going to happen there (Pakistan) I‘m in
charge.”
Most questions focus
on Kashmir. The Time magazine correspondent, asks whether the Chief
Executive has found Clinton
unhelpful because of his brief stopover in Pakistan during his extended
visit to India and also whether the Chief Executive expected to run for
elective office. Musharraf
said “ I am a soldier. I will remain a soldier. I like acting like a
soldier.”
I asked Musharraf
two questions:
Because the army has
played such a significant role in Pakistan’s governance for Fifty plus
years, do you see a constitutional provision for the role of the Army in
governance? And second Would
you favor people-to-people peace initiatives in addition to
Government-to-government peace initiatives?
Musharraf states
that yes he would consider
giving the army a continued role in governance and “we are thinking
along these lines” and yes, when
“government –to- government efforts are not working well yes I would support people-to-people initiatives yes I would certainly
support that.” The CE appeared pleased by the questions. They gave him
an opportunity to sound like more like a statesman and less like a
usurper. But the questions
were asked largely to take the focus off Kashmir and to suggest
alternative glimpses of the leader and his policies particularly in the
transition between military takeover and alleged governance reform.
The point about
these UN press conferences is most of the real action happens in the
hallways and the coffee shops. I
was stopped by several people who said they were were “good
questions.” One who offered his card and left immediately I
immediately asked them for their business cards, if they didn’t offer them first. One who proffered his
business card and left almost immediately turns out to be a member of
the Permanent Mission of the Organization of the Islamic Conference to
the United Nation. I
also got telephone numbers and room numbers
at the Roosevelt Hotel where the Pakistani delegation is staying
as well as phone numbers in Islamabad.
The Press Attache for the Chief Executive, Major General
Queraishi is enormously
charming and skilful. The
so-called chielf of Reconstruction, Naqvi,
definitely less charming, said to me, when I requested further
information “Where are you from?
I hope you are not going to ask questions like that
TV woman. I said
“Did you hear my questions? A
Filipina woman who has
worked for decades with the Pak mission and I exchanged cards and lots
of laughs about making it in New York. On the way to catch the M15 to
the A train I am stopped by an elderly gentleman who presents his card
and says he liked my questions. He is familiar with World Parliamentarian magazine. He used
to be Director of the Africa Division but is now special advisor to the
Kyrgystan Delegation to the UN. A
New York case of diplomatic re-invention that the Filipina woman and I
laughed about earlier.
More speeches
and statements, more interviews, more business cards, more
conversations in corridors to attempt to put the pieces together. Summit days are almost ending but the work is just beginning.
Chithra
KarunaKaran
September 07, 2000
New York City