The rule was implied once but kept in abeyance owing to the widespread protest from the riders. There is no dispute regarding the element of safety involved; but it is the inconvenience factor that matters for many and also the physical disorders that may get afflicted, for some others.

In tropical climate; where the humidity is high, there will be profuse sweating of the head, which the synthetic covering inside the helmet will add to, leading to sinusitis and other ENT problems. And worst are the condition of our roads that wearing a helmet on ride is as good as putting half a kilogram weight on one's head and jumping up and down resulting in diseases of the spondyle.

Elaborating the cases of accidents; even people wearing helmets are fatally knocked down such that it gives no cent percent protection to head; and injury to other parts of the body too cannot be saved. So the general question is that do we have to make all the people sick for the sake of a possible grievous accident for some.

While the people who use the bikes less or never at all argue for helmet, those who ride on two-wheeler regularly are against it. Here sets in the inconvenience factor as to where to keep the object when not in use? Perhaps bike manufacturing companies can think of designing vehicles to keep helmets secured on to it and offer a pair of helmets as freebies in future. Such a move will help to ensure the quality of the helmets too.

As for the government it will be wise to implement the rule by making it mandatory to purchase a pair of helmets along with two-wheeler than to compel people to wear it; to satisfy the court ruling presently.

Calicut, J J Vellara