Kerala
chief minister V.S. Achuthanandan’s attack on certain newspapers has made a
new controversy in Kerala. He alleged Malayala Manorama and Deepika had
received fund from CIA during emergency.
Both
the newspaper management came forward and questioned V.S’s allegation and
challenged him to prove the claim. Being a chief minister, he has the
responsibility to prove the claim, the newspapers say. But another important
aspect is that during the election campaign, Manorama focused Achuthananthan
and a good coverage was given to his speeches and programmes.
He had
really enjoyed the reportage and he got a heroic image no other leaders
could claim at that time. But Deepika not only didn’t support him but
attacked him from both sides and portrayed him as an ambitious politician
with self-interests. May be as a result of good coverage also, Achuthanandan
had received a heroic image and public support during Kerala assembly
election.
The
newspapers especially Manorama projected him positively. Even though the
newspaper has a clear-cut view against Communist party, Manorama might have
utilized the factional fight between Pinarayi and Achuthanandan groups. But
that helped Achuthanandan. Same daily stands against the C.M now.
K.M
Mathew, the chief editor of Manorama says Achuthanandan should not act as a
Fascist. He added that a responsible chief minister with power upon his
hands could enquire all these issues by using govt. machineries. Without
doing that, these sorts of outbursts never help him.
But
V.S has reiterated his allegations even after the newspaper’s sharp
criticism.
Many
political leaders, mainly from congress party questioned V.S’s allegations
because he had told the media that congress funded the newspapers for CIA to
keep away Communist party rule in Kerala.
These
circumstances will make new problems in Communist party. One faction of the
party believes that V.S’s image is built by media. The same image will ruin
very soon they look on. At the moment heated debate is going in Kerala on
V.S’s allegation and the follow-up issues.